Kerem Ozan Bayraktar, “An opening ceremony for a public statue”, 2013, computer animation, 00″08′ (loop)

The human activity is now the dominant influence on the Earth’s environmental and climate balance. Technological progress is depredating the planet’s resources at an increasing speed, and leading to a number of catastrophes that seem more and more inevitable.As stated by Hannah Arendt, progress and catastrophe are not two separate contingencies – they are in fact the opposite faces of the same coin. Paul Virilio goes further with this idea by stating that the development of any technology automatically implies not only the chance, but rather the promise of an accident. In this perspective, inventing the nuclear reactor means essentially to set up a future nuclear disaster (Chernobyl, Ukraine, 1986; Fukushima, Japan, 2011); developing the technology for oil extraction means preparing a catastrophic oil spill (Gulf of Mexico, 2010); building rigs for mines extraction is to guarantee an environmental disaster (Minas Gerais, Brasil, 2015). This list, long and yet unfinished, rapidly increases at the same rate at which any technical progress is achieved.

Progress will not stop, that is clear, but its catastrophic outcomes need to be managed and contained. Important efforts in this direction were made during the COP21 (Paris, 2015), following which an agreement was subscribed by 187 countries to keep the global warming below 2 °C, and hence reduce the carbon emissions by containing the use of fossil fuels to a very strict level. With an unprecedented speed and to everyone’s astonishment, the agreement entered into force only a few months later, attesting, if anything, the urgency for action.Unfortunately, the situation is far from inspiring optimism only. The goals set are still not strict enough to contain the expected disasters resulting from global warming, and the lack of a transnational authority responsible for action and regulation makes one guess if even these goals will ever be reached. However, this result can be considered a significant starting point.From here on, much needs to be done, especially on an individual level.Broadly speaking, in a cycle that we could often observe throughout history, when society and politics are lacking the power, the ability and/or the will to find a solution to the multi-level crisis, all pressing contemporary issues regain a privileged position within the artistic research, regathering at the center of the creative practice. Our aim with the second edition of Art Speaks Out is to bring together a significant group of artists clearly striving to achieve a change in society and increase the global sensibility toward the environment and climate change.The central issue that such a project might raise is also a central question in the contemporary art discourse: is art able to provoke a change? What is the place (and the chance) of art in taking part in the political discourse? Art Speaks Out can be looked at as a rather small contribution to the global speech on climate change. Our hope with this program is to raise awareness about the destruction of the environment as a negative turnout of the technical progress we blindly pursue. Hopefully these reflections will help to impulse a change of habits, leading to reduce the wastes and everyday consume – by bearing in mind that modifying our own behavior first is a necessary step toward a global improvement to be achieved in the near future.

Exhibition on view at WACE – Arkane Afrikain occasion of the UN Climate Change Summit COP22
ArtCOP22 (Marrakesh, Morocco) November 7-18, 2016

@